Academic Archive

"And be It so enacted": natural law and southern federalism in the fugitive slave controversy

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Denning, Robert
dc.contributor.author Jenkins, Natasha Townsel
dc.date.accessioned 2017-08-29T19:37:41Z
dc.date.available 2017-08-29T19:37:41Z
dc.date.issued 2017-06
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10474/3184
dc.description.abstract Despite the vast research on the events that led to the Civil War, little scholarship focuses solely on the extent to which the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 played a role. While historians highlight the law’s political, social, and cultural significance to the sectional conflict, the literature on the Fugitive Slave Law does not consider its importance to the ideological debate that exacerbated the rift between the Free and Slave states. This study focuses on the impact that the differing interpretations of Natural Law had on the sectional conflict, and how each section’s prioritization of personal liberty and property underscores the true nature of the states’ rights debate. An analysis of antebellum newspapers, pamphlets, and fugitive slave cases demonstrates that the Free states were more inclined to argue for states’ rights during the fugitive slave crisis, whereas Slave states argued in favor of federalism to protect their right to recover their slave property. This examination will add to Civil War scholarship by inverting the states’ rights defense in favor of the northern states and further highlight the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 as one of the leading causes of the disunion that led to civil war. (Author abstract) en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Southern New Hampshire University en_US
dc.relation.requires Adobe Acrobat Reader en_US
dc.rights Author retains all ownership rights. Further reproduction in violation of copyright is prohibited en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Southern New Hampshire University -- Theses (History) en_US
dc.subject.other American history en_US
dc.subject.other antebellum en_US
dc.subject.other American Civil War en_US
dc.subject.other fugitive slaves en_US
dc.subject.other natural law en_US
dc.subject.other slavery en_US
dc.subject.other state's rights en_US
dc.title "And be It so enacted": natural law and southern federalism in the fugitive slave controversy en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMember Irvine, Robert
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Jenkins, N. T. (2017). "And be it so enacted": natural law and southern federalism in the fugitive slave controversy. Retrieved from http://academicarchive.snhu.edu en_US
dc.description.degree Master Arts en_US
dc.description.program History en_US
dc.description.school College of Online and Continuing Education en_US
dc.digSpecs PDF/A-1b en_US
dc.rightsHolder Jenkins, Natasha Townsel


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record